Use near-AGI models to defend your systems and supply chain. Audit yourself or your vendors from the inside out.
For SaaS, Tools, Agents, Harnesses, and More
All requests assessed by the founding team.
"Security is the art of making the invisible wall feel like the open sky."
After Sagan · Voyager 1, 1990Spud* Mythos* ChatGPT 5.5 Claude 4.7 Gemini 3.1.
Spud (OpenAI) and Mythos (Anthropic) are not yet generally available. AGI.security is preparing for the day they are.
The next wave of foundation models will surface every vulnerability in your code, your tools, your agents, your harnesses, and your supply chain. At machine speed. Adversaries get the same capabilities your engineers do, the same week.
Use AI to fight AI. Audit yourself before they do, or ask your vendors to do the same.
"The best defense against bad AI is good AI."
AGI.security applies near-AGI models defensively. The product is architected on the same foundation models being weaponized: OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, and Google Gemini. Every assessment ends with the AGI.S v0.1 Attestation, a verifiable record of findings, scope, and remediation paths that travels with the report.
AGI.security uses near-AGI models to run structured security checks across vendor codebases, environments, agents, and harnesses. The output is findings you can actually trust. Go beyond SOC 2 and pen tests with deeper assurance, for yourself or for the supply chain you depend on.
For decades, vendor due diligence relied on approximation.
SOC 2 reports. ISO certifications. Security questionnaires. Penetration tests. These became proxies for trust, designed to estimate a vendor's security posture rather than continuously verify it.
But the model carried an inherent flaw: the vendor selected the auditor, controlled the process, and approved the outcome.
Buyers accepted the tradeoff because there was no practical alternative.
That tradeoff no longer works.
Modern software systems are increasingly shaped by AI-generated code and rapidly expanding attack surfaces. Vulnerabilities are more abundant, more dynamic, and harder to detect through surface-level reviews alone.
Enterprises now require deeper assurance.
For the first time, vendors can provide it.
Code-level assurance was always technically possible. It was simply operationally impossible at scale. AI changes that equation entirely.
Security findings can now be interpreted, prioritized, and translated into actionable assurance in real time.
The market is ready. The technology is ready. The next era of vendor trust begins now.
unlock next-level assurance.
win superior customer trust.
A suite of read-only tools runs locally, inside the vendor's dedicated environment. Nothing is shipped to a third party. The tools surface tenant-level evidence drawn directly from source code, configuration, and infrastructure as it actually exists.
An AI layer sits on top. It summarizes, prioritizes, and translates raw findings into a buyer-ready narrative. The vendor sees what the buyer sees. The buyer sees what the vendor knows. Both sides work from the same record.
Read-only · Tenant-scoped · Zero exfiltration
Source code, CI/CD, containers, cloud infrastructure, or production replicas.
Proprietary, open-source, or fine-tuned models.
Swipe to follow the flow →
Tools run locally in the vendor's environment.
Source code and intellectual property stay with the vendor.
Only findings and reports are shared, and only with explicit permission.
Built for collaborative remediation, not gotchas.
Every AGI.security report ships with the AGI.S v0.1 Attestation: verifiable proof of findings, scope, and remediation paths, reviewed and approved by a Certified Security Professional (vCISO) before issue. Each attestation joins a ledger of vendor posture over time, so buyers and vendors engage on a shared record of truth.
SHA256 a4f29c12·b7ed·44d8 · CIS v8.1 · OWASP ASVS L2 · Expires 2026·09·30
We hold ourselves to the same bar we set for vendors. AGI.security generates an AGI.S v0.1 attestation from our own source code and our own production instance, and we share that report with the buyers and vendors we work with.
We won't ask you to do anything we haven't already done on ourselves.
AGI.security helps companies complete security reviews faster by giving vendors a way to run a technical assessment and share a verifiable report with the buyer.
Instead of relying only on a questionnaire, SOC 2 report, or other point-in-time evidence, AGI.security can assess scoped technical surfaces like source code, CI/CD configuration, containers, cloud buckets, infrastructure, staging environments, or copies of production.
The goal is simple: help buyers make better risk decisions, and help vendors prove their security posture without months of back-and-forth.
AGI.security is especially useful for fast-moving vendors that need to prove security posture before they have mature compliance artifacts.
That includes AI startups, early-stage SaaS companies, smaller vendors, vendors without SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and vendors whose buyers need more technical assurance than a questionnaire can provide.
It is also useful for enterprise buyers that need a practical Plan B when the business wants to use a vendor that does not yet fit the traditional security review process.
"Run locally" means the vendor runs the AGI.security assessment inside an environment they control.
In practice, that may mean downloading a local runner or containerized package, choosing what to assess, granting scoped permissions, and running the assessment against selected assets such as a repository, container, CI/CD pipeline, bucket, staging environment, or copy of production.
The vendor controls the scope. They choose what is included, what is excluded, and what permissions are granted. The output is a report that can be reviewed and, when ready, shared with the buyer.
AGI.security only has access to what the vendor explicitly scopes for the assessment.
The local runner may need scoped read access to selected assets, such as source code, CI/CD configuration, containers, cloud configuration, buckets, staging environments, or a copy of production. The vendor controls what is included, what is excluded, and what permissions are granted.
The local runner is designed to inspect the scoped environment and produce assessment outputs. AGI.security is not designed to give the buyer raw access to the vendor's source code, secrets, production data, or internal systems. The buyer receives the report.
Yes, in most workflows the local runner will need to send assessment output to AGI.security so a report can be generated, validated, and reviewed.
That feed should be limited to the artifacts required for the assessment workflow, such as findings, severity information, scan metadata, report evidence, configuration summaries, hashes, logs, and report integrity details. It should not function as an open-ended pipe into the vendor's environment.
The important distinction is this: the local runner may inspect scoped assets inside the vendor's environment, but AGI.security and the buyer do not receive unrestricted access to that environment. The transmitted output should be bounded, documented, and tied to the report generation and review process.
The AGI.security review team reviews the assessment output, not unrestricted access to the vendor's environment.
This may include generated findings, severity ratings, supporting evidence, scan metadata, configuration summaries, remediation notes, report integrity details, and other artifacts needed to validate the report.
The purpose of the review is to reduce false positives, clarify risk, and make the report useful for both the buyer and the vendor. The review team should not need broad access to raw source code, production data, secrets, or internal systems unless the vendor explicitly approves a workflow that includes deeper evidence review.
No. AGI.security is designed to augment existing security and compliance workflows, not replace them.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen tests, Snyk, Wiz, and security questionnaires all serve useful purposes. But they often leave a gap: they are either point-in-time, self-attested, manually completed, hard to verify, or unavailable when a fast-moving vendor is still early in its security maturity.
AGI.security helps fill that gap with an on-demand technical assessment and a verifiable report. It gives buyers a faster way to understand real technical risk, and it gives vendors a faster way to provide security evidence without waiting months for a formal audit cycle.
AGI.security can also bring existing security questionnaires into the assessment flow. Instead of asking a person to manually complete a spreadsheet, the assessment can evaluate those questions against the scoped environment and supporting evidence. The buyer gets answers that are more current, more consistent, and grounded in the same technical assessment used to generate the report.
The result is not "less security review." It is a more evidence-based security review.
Snyk, Wiz, Semgrep, and similar tools are valuable for organizations that already have them deployed, configured, and managed. AGI.security is different because it is designed for security review between a buyer and a vendor.
The product is not just about finding issues. It is about creating a structured, verifiable assessment that a vendor can run and a buyer can trust.
A vendor-generated Claude or ChatGPT report may be useful internally, but it is not standardized, independently reviewable, or verifiable in the same way. AGI.security adds methodology, report integrity, review, and buyer-facing trust.
The vendor can use the findings to fix problems before or after sharing the report, depending on the review workflow.
Findings can be prioritized by severity, exploitability, and relevance to the scoped environment. The vendor can remediate issues, re-run the assessment, and produce an updated report that shows what changed.
The goal is not to create another static security artifact. The goal is to help vendors identify risk, improve quickly, and give buyers a clearer view of progress.
AGI.security is not a guarantee that a company is secure.
It is not a replacement for a full audit, mature security program, continuous monitoring, incident response, secure development practices, or ongoing vendor risk management. The quality of the assessment depends on what is scoped, what access is granted, what evidence is available, and how findings are reviewed.
AGI.security is designed to make security reviews faster, more technical, and more evidence-based. It should be used as part of a broader security and compliance workflow.
Have more questions? Contact us at hello@agi.security.
Surfaced a vulnerability that SOC 2 and an external penetration test had missed on a real production environment.
Early enterprise design partner conversations underway.
Built by a team that has run vendor risk and security assurance programs at scale.
All requests assessed by the founding team. By invitation, for now.